|
SOTU
Feb 3, 2005 23:12:12 GMT -5
Post by StonerStudent on Feb 3, 2005 23:12:12 GMT -5
I didn't get to watch the SOTU last night [work] what is everyones take? I heard that the FMA came up again and while I'll take unions over nothing and I don't beleive a FMA is going anywhere at the Fed level. I'm not happy that my boy GWB is still pushing it.
I'm a conservative as far as most things go [military, lower taxes etc.] but I don't belong to the LRC simply because I don't beleive in glueing myself to a party.
|
|
|
SOTU
Feb 5, 2005 16:20:44 GMT -5
Post by Kacer on Feb 5, 2005 16:20:44 GMT -5
I didn't get to watch the SOTU last night [work] what is everyones take? I heard that the FMA came up again and while I'll take unions over nothing and I don't beleive a FMA is going anywhere at the Fed level. I'm not happy that my boy GWB is still pushing it. I'm a conservative as far as most things go [military, lower taxes etc.] but I don't belong to the LRC simply because I don't beleive in glueing myself to a party. Sorry, pal. I didn't watch the SOTU as I have an aversion to wasting time. I know YOU think GWB is mostly a "good guy" but hey, even a busted clock is right twice a day Rumsfeld is about THE ONLY thing he did REALLY right, IMO, and for the right "reasons" (mostly) but shoot, he's getting rid of HIM... so, IMO we're a BIT less SOOL than we WOULD have been if Skerry had gotten in, and a lot WORSE than if Badnarik had pulled a serious rabbit. (Although, IMO, he'd have really FU w/the Iraq thing... I THINK that's the only issue I didn't agree w/him on. And even there, I agree in PRINCIPAL, but in "practice"... I just don't see it. Anyway, he HAD to do that, IMO, if he hadn't hs approval rating wouldn't be a whopping 50%
|
|